Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Phenolic,Symbiotik,Pascalite Diaphragm

  1. #11
    Senior Hostboard Member
    Phenolic,Symbiotik,Pascalite Diaphragm


    Old Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 23rd, 2003
    Posts
    6,359
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    62 Post(s)

    Post

    Sorry mant 288 with Pascalite. 291 is the same with Symbiotik. Replace the diapragms with pascalite in either case. 299 are ferrite mags. You probably want alnico.

  2. #12
    Hostboard Member Jimmy DIY's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 2nd, 2005
    Posts
    42
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Hi bfish,

    Originally posted by bfish:
    .....For the more rugged duty down around 300-500Hz (Don't expect much around 250, even at 300 I'd still filter steeply...........The horn selected still has control of things though, and it takes some mass to control 300Hz and not ring, so my pick would be the 311, or maybe a well-made wood horn. Whether a 288 or 290 is a preference/requirement call, high SPLs or wide BW.

    Installing the Pascalight 'frams in 288s would be my choice, ~same BW as aluminum and handles the rough stuff better ( lasts longer too ). I'd stress the steep XO and proper horn to take any of them to their lower limit, it isn't pretty when they unload from program material below the horn cutoff.
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Do you mean neither the 290 with the Phenolic diaphragm nor the 288 with the Pascalite diaphragm can be used down to 250HZ? If it is the fact, that mean only the WE594A, WE555 and RCA MI-1428B can do it?

    Rgds

    Jimmy

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This forum has been viewed: 28131802 times.